Re: RESPOND ASAP - DAR language

1. I am in favor of INCLUDING THE TRIGGER in the DAR.  We can argue that we are presenting TWO PATHS to success to overrule Citizens United, and acknowledge that the Congressional approach, while preferable in the face of "runaway fears', is not likely to be possible in the next 2 or 4 or possibly 8 years (heaven help us!)

2. What about using "inalienable constitutional rights"?

Cheers,

Hank

Hank@TakomaHomes.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hank Prensky, Realtor

Long & Foster Real Estate

Mobile Phone: 301-455-4427

Office  Phone:  301-891-8709

Home  Phone:  301-585-2255

 

Website:  www.TakomaHomes.com

 

Long & Foster Real Estate Office:

1 Columbia Avenue
Takoma Park  MD  20912

Ph: 301-270-7026

Fax:301-270-4880

On Dec 20, 2016, at 6:49 AM, Charlie Cooper <charlie.coop47@gmail.com> wrote:

Here are the notes from the legislative work plan:

1/21/2021 would be the trigger date. 11-year anniversary of Citizens United. Propose trigger to the sponsor. Charlie suggests remove "political" from "inalienable political rights" in the first RESOLVED clause of DAR.

 

I would also add that we must add in Rhode Island to the list of states we intend to align with (near the bottom of page 2).

 

Therefore, please vote on the following:

1.      Include the trigger provision. I'm not sure why we would offer this after our meeting with Busch. They didn't raise it. I think Wylie should try to reach Jeremy as he has not responded to my e-mail, and I'm not sure he received it.  _____ Yes      _____ No

 

2.     Remove "p0litical" from "inalienable political rights."  _____ Yes      _____ No

 

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.getmoneyoutmd.org  <image001.jpg>

 

"We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." – Louis Brandeis