Saturday, August 31, 2024
Georgia election board goes from moribund to MAGA activist
Friday, August 30, 2024
The Billionaires behind record high-dollar contributions to PACs
Monday, August 26, 2024
List of megadonors
SCOTUS issues shadow docket rulings in Arizona election disputes
"Third, and most importantly, there's the difference-splitting votes of one/both of the Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh—and the difficulty of reconciling those votes with the Court's purported adherence to the controversial "Purcell principle." Professor Rick Hasen wrote about this over at his Election Law Blog on Friday, but to make a long story short, the best defense of Purcell is the need to avoid court rulings that increase voter confusion heading into an election cycle. How can that "principle" be reconciled with a ruling that puts back into effect Arizona's requirement that those registering to vote on the state paper form provide documentary proof of citizenship, when those who register online or use the federal form don't have to? Or the need for different ballots depending upon whether the voter registered with a state paper form, a state electronic form, or a federal form? Or the possibility that those who used the state paper form while the proof-of-citizenship requirement was blocked might now have their registrations rejected?"
Election deniers in swing states are organized and working to subvert state laws
Saturday, August 24, 2024
Outside spending (e.g., PACs, SuperPACs, etc.) way, way up
Name – Founding - Tendency | Millions of $ |
Make America Great Again, Inc. (MAGA) – new Trump-aligned | $125 |
American for Prosperity – long-standing Republican | $ 78 |
Future Forward "Repeal tax cuts for the rich and focus on policies that help the middle class" founded 2018 | $ 48 |
Fairshake – New. Pro-cryptocurrency | $ 46 |
United Democracy Project – New. Founded 12/21 by American Israel PAC to oppose progressives | $ 36 |
TOTAL | $313 |
Friday, August 23, 2024
Reclusive heir of Mellon fortune pours $165 million into Republican coffers
Thursday, August 22, 2024
Bill introduced to overturn SCOTUS decision in Snyder v.
Dem Convention "side" events bar press
Wednesday, August 21, 2024
Crypto corporations spending big to influence 2024 election
Bernie Sanders says Dems can ban SuperPACs from their primary elections
Monday, August 19, 2024
Dem-linked group sues Musk for voter suppression
Saturday, August 17, 2024
Op-ed on partisan divide and future of democracy in U.S.
Opinion | Trump Has Opened the Pathway to Reform
Jamelle Bouie
Apart from Donald Trump, the basic problem of the Republican Party's so-called fever — the extent to which it has been captured by nihilists and ideological extremists — is that the party is untethered from any electoral dynamic that might force it to moderate its behavior.
For example, despite the much-discussed willingness of some Black and Hispanic men to support the occasional Republican candidate (mostly Trump), the Republican coalition is still overwhelmingly white and conservative and spread throughout the nation's rural and exurban counties. In theory, there are tensions within the Republican coalition — the party's commitment to the interests of the superrich is an uneasy fit, to say the least, with the most downscale elements of its blue-collar constituency; in practice, those tensions are subsumed by commitments to a shared cultural (and often religious) identity.
Democrats must navigate a large and fractious alliance of interests, some of which are at odds or cross-purposes with each other. Republicans, by contrast, can sail the relatively calm waters of demographic homogeneity. But what this also means is that there is no force internal to the Republican Party's electoral coalition that might force its representatives onto a different path.
In the absence of an alternative demographic or ideological base from which to build influence, the ambitious Republican politician has one option if he or she hopes to advance within the party: rigid commitment to ideological purity. The only way to get ahead is to out-conservative — or now, out-MAGA — your rivals.
There is no incentive for anything else. If you want to win a primary, if you want to ascend to leadership, if you want to avoid the ire of conservative media, if you want to be on a national ticket, then you cannot have enemies to your right. There is no room, in the national Republican Party, for the moderate Republican governor of a Democratic state — the Larry Hogans and Charlie Bakers of American politics. There is not even room, it turns out, for the pragmatic conservatives of the party — the Nikki Haleys and Mitt Romneys.
Ostensibly, the pressure to win a general election should work to curb and curtail this dynamic. But the demographic homogeneity of the Republican coalition confers a distinct advantage on the party: It gives it a high floor from which to engage the biennial contest for control of the national government. When enough states in the union are low density and low population, the party that dominates the nation's rural areas already controls nearly half the seats in the Senate and has a significant advantage in the House of Representatives as well.
What's more, the efficient distribution of Republican and Republican-leaning voters — rural and exurban America extends through every state — means that, as we've seen in two of the last six presidential elections, a Republican presidential candidate does not need to win the most votes nationwide to win the Electoral College and therefore the White House.
The ability to win power without winning votes is a powerful disincentive to change. As we see with Trump's struggle to break out of his MAGA echo chamber, it stunts a politician's — and a party's — ability to reach beyond the faithful. It has also stimulated, among the Republican rank-and-file, a real disdain for what the Republican senator Mike Lee called "rank democracy," exemplified in the assertion that the United States is a "republic, not a democracy." It makes sense: If more democracy would make it harder for Republicans to win, then more democracy can't be good.
The United States will always have a conservative party, but American democracy needs that party to be committed to the maintenance of our democratic institutions. The only way to plot a path from here to there is to forcibly change the incentives within the Republican Party, which is to say, the only way to break the fever is to change the rules of the game. A more democratic American democracy — where majorities elect and majorities rule — would force the Republican Party to try, once again, to compete for national majorities.
The reforms are straightforward. End the Electoral College and move to a national popular vote, possibly by embracing the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. End partisan gerrymandering and experiment with forms of voting that might enable more party competition, like fusion, which would let two or more parties nominate the same candidate for office. End the filibuster and pass a new, more robust Voting Rights Act. Grant Washington, D.C., statehood in accordance with the wishes of a majority of its residents. And pursue reform of the entire federal judiciary, so that the Supreme Court, which has been too happy to help Republicans entrench minority rule in the states, cannot take an ax to this agenda.
If the aim of both the Democratic Party and its allies is to protect and defend American democracy, then it cannot avoid a confrontation with those aspects of the American system that enabled the Republican spiral into nihilism. If Democrats win control of Washington in November, they should make reforming our democracy a priority, since even without Trump, the sickness in the Republican Party will remain. It will take strong medicine to save the patient. Democrats must be prepared to administer the cure.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.
Jamelle Bouie became a New York Times Opinion columnist in 2019. Before that he was the chief political correspondent for Slate magazine. He is based in Charlottesville, Va., and Washington. @jbouie
A version of this article appears in print on Aug. 18, 2024, Section SR, Page 2 of the New York edition with the headline: Reform Is Boring. We Still Need It. . Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe
Thursday, August 15, 2024
Foreign money in U.S. elections and the Corporate Transparency Act
We can break the partisan cycle by unrigging the system - The Fulcrum
Monday, August 12, 2024
Supreme Court reform widely popular, new poll shows
Georgia invites more partisan election bickering with new rule
[The Washington Post] Insurance lobbyists block federal crackdown on costly retirement advice
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/08/11/insurance-lobbyists-block-fiduciary-rule/
Saturday, August 10, 2024
Jamelle Bouie: J.D. Vance associates oppose democracy
The single most troubling thing about Senator JD Vance — his bizarre understanding of the work of J.R.R. Tolkien notwithstanding — is his close relationship with some of the most extreme elements of the American right.
When asked to explain his worldview, Vance has cited his former boss, Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist who has written passionately against democracy ("I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible"), and Curtis Yarvin, a software developer turned blogger and provocateur who believes the United States should transition to monarchy ("If Americans want to change their government, they're going to have to get over their dictator phobia"). Yarvin has also written favorably of human bondage (slavery, he once wrote, "is a natural human relationship") and wondered aloud if apartheid wasn't better for Black South Africans.
While Vance's admirers see him as a uniquely intellectual presence in American politics — a thinker as much as a politician — his right-wing, authoritarian views are largely derivative of the views and preoccupations of Thiel, Yarvin and their community of "postliberal" ideologues and reactionary venture capitalists. Take Vance's view that the United States is in a period of Romanesque decline. "We are in a late republican period," Vance said on a podcast in 2021. "If we're going to push back against it, we're going to have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with."
Compare this to Thiel's view that "liberalism" and "democracy" are "exhausted," and that to restore the nation "we have to ask some questions very far outside the Overton window." Is this a call for new tax cuts, or does it represent a fundamental hostility toward popular constitutional government in the United States?
In addition to relationships with Thiel and Yarvin, Vance is also in close contact with the bottom feeders on the far right. For nearly two years, according to The Washington Post, Vance was in regular conversation by text message with Chuck Johnson, a notorious Holocaust denier who has spent the better part of a decade promoting right-wing conspiracy theories.
And as my colleague Michelle Goldberg wrote this week, Vance is close enough to Jack Posobiec — an alt-right lunatic who pushed the vile and absurd Pizzagate conspiracy theory and collaborated with online neo-Nazis to spread antisemitic hate — to blurb his latest book, a polemic devoted to the idea that liberals and leftists are Untermenschen who must be stopped lest they destroy civilization. "As they are opposed to humanity itself," Posobiec and his co-author, Joshua Lisec, write, "they place themselves outside of the category completely, in an entirely new misery-driven subdivision, the unhuman."
These are the friends and influences that JD Vance brought with him to the United States Senate, and these will almost certainly be the same friends and influences he'll bring to the White House if he is elected vice president.
Dems ' Attorney: Georgia Election Board Passes Rule That Could Delay Election Certification
Thursday, August 8, 2024
Brennan Center says Musk disseminating election falsehoods
- Grok: It would be illegal to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee. In reality, he had not yet been nominated.
- America PAC funded by Musk ran ads that led potential voters to enter information on the premise that it would help them register to vote, but it did not direct voters in swing states to actual registration sites.