Saturday, August 31, 2024

Georgia election board goes from moribund to MAGA activist


Georgia has long been subject to questionable voter purges supported by Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, both Republicans. Under a new law, an individual citizen can challenge the voter registration of tens of thousands of voters "based on unvetted documentation and unreliable information . . . , such as screenshots of purported property records or social media posts." Federal courts are reviewing the law and the implementation.

However, the newest attack on election integrity comes from the formerly inactive state board of elections. With the appointment of a majority of MAGA members, they have adopted the now well-known procedure for each county election board to refuse to certify an election as they conduct a "reasonable inquiry" to determine whether tabulation and canvassing are true and accurate. The existing practice has been to tally the results from mail-in ballots and various polling stations and to leave dispute resolution to the courts.

"[T]he Georgia Association of Voter Registration and Election Officials (GAVREO), which is composed of over 500 county election workers and officials across the state, asked the board to stop passing last-minute rule changes," however, they plan to consider new rules at a meeting scheduled for September 20.

Friday, August 30, 2024

The Billionaires behind record high-dollar contributions to PACs


A good summary that shows that big money is setting new records and gives examples of which billionaires want what policy concessions. Republicans are leading Democrats in the highest-dollar contributions.

Monday, August 26, 2024

List of megadonors

SCOTUS issues shadow docket rulings in Arizona election disputes


SCOTUS reversed a lower court and put back a confusing ruling that is at odds with their self-proclaimed "Purcell principle" that rulings too close to an election should be avoided in order not to confuse voters. See a quote below from UofTexas law professor Steve Vladeck.

"Third, and most importantly, there's the difference-splitting votes of one/both of the Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh—and the difficulty of reconciling those votes with the Court's purported adherence to the controversial "Purcell principle." Professor Rick Hasen wrote about this over at his Election Law Blog on Friday, but to make a long story short, the best defense of Purcell is the need to avoid court rulings that increase voter confusion heading into an election cycle. How can that "principle" be reconciled with a ruling that puts back into effect Arizona's requirement that those registering to vote on the state paper form provide documentary proof of citizenship, when those who register online or use the federal form don't have to? Or the need for different ballots depending upon whether the voter registered with a state paper form, a state electronic form, or a federal form? Or the possibility that those who used the state paper form while the proof-of-citizenship requirement was blocked might now have their registrations rejected?"


Election deniers in swing states are organized and working to subvert state laws


In Georgia, the Republican-dominated state board of elections has ordered local boards to conduct "a reasonable inquiry" before certifying election results. There is no new funding or staff accompanying the order. Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger says that this new rule is illegal if it conflicts with state law requiring that county boards certify election results by November 12 (one week after election day). Local boards in Arizona, Michigan, and Nevada have refused to certify elections in the past and are organizing to resist deadlines.

Saturday, August 24, 2024

Outside spending (e.g., PACs, SuperPACs, etc.) way, way up



Outside spending through August 15 is nearly double that seen in any prior federal election cycle.
Here are the 5 biggest spenders so  far:

Name – Founding - Tendency

Millions of $

Make America Great Again, Inc. (MAGA) – new Trump-aligned

$125

American for Prosperity – long-standing Republican       

$ 78

Future Forward "Repeal tax cuts for the rich and focus on policies that help the middle class" founded 2018

$ 48

Fairshake – New.  Pro-cryptocurrency

$ 46

United Democracy Project – New. Founded 12/21 by American Israel PAC to oppose progressives

$ 36

TOTAL

$313

Friday, August 23, 2024

Thursday, August 22, 2024

Bill introduced to overturn SCOTUS decision in Snyder v.


"The Supreme Court decision in Snyder v. United States stated that there was no federal law prohibiting state and local officials from taking payments if they came after official actions without being 'corruptly sought.'" The bill has bi-partisan support and would close the loophole so that tips would be illegal.


Dem Convention "side" events bar press


There are many lobbyist, corporate, consultant, and union sponsored events in conjunction with the convention that are closed to press. Here is a somewhat humorous look at one reporter's experiences.

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

Crypto corporations spending big to influence 2024 election



New report from Public Citizen shows crypto corporations are spending unprecedented amounts of direct corporate cash on the 2024 election. [There are many ways corporate money gets into the election, however.]
"Crypto-sector corporations – primarily Coinbase and Ripple – have dumped over $119 million in real dollars into the 2024 elections so far, almost entirely into super PACs dedicated to elevating pro-crypto candidates and attacking crypto skeptics." Much of the money goes to FairshakePAC, which also gets big money from individual wealthy crypto executives and investors.



Bernie Sanders says Dems can ban SuperPACs from their primary elections


In and around the Democratic National Convention, Bernie Sanders has consistently raised the issue of big money in politics. He has proposed that Democrats ban SuperPAC money from its primary elections in the states. AIPAC money helped to defeat two Sanders allies: Rep. Jamal Bowman of NY and Rep. Cori Bush of MO.


Monday, August 19, 2024

Dem-linked group sues Musk for voter suppression


Elon Musk's American PAC supports Trump. It solicits data from people who want to register to vote. However, a criminal referral to the Department of Justice from Defend the Vote states that people from battleground states are not linked to voter registration mechanisms.

Saturday, August 17, 2024

Op-ed on partisan divide and future of democracy in U.S.


Jamelle Bouie, NY Times, columnist summarizes the arguments around the work we are doing in GMOM.
nytimes.com

Opinion | Trump Has Opened the Pathway to Reform

Jamelle Bouie

A group of people on the floor of the Republican convention, including a man with an Uncle Sam-style top hat.
Credit...Jamie Lee Taete for The New York Times

Apart from Donald Trump, the basic problem of the Republican Party's so-called fever — the extent to which it has been captured by nihilists and ideological extremists — is that the party is untethered from any electoral dynamic that might force it to moderate its behavior.

For example, despite the much-discussed willingness of some Black and Hispanic men to support the occasional Republican candidate (mostly Trump), the Republican coalition is still overwhelmingly white and conservative and spread throughout the nation's rural and exurban counties. In theory, there are tensions within the Republican coalition — the party's commitment to the interests of the superrich is an uneasy fit, to say the least, with the most downscale elements of its blue-collar constituency; in practice, those tensions are subsumed by commitments to a shared cultural (and often religious) identity.

Democrats must navigate a large and fractious alliance of interests, some of which are at odds or cross-purposes with each other. Republicans, by contrast, can sail the relatively calm waters of demographic homogeneity. But what this also means is that there is no force internal to the Republican Party's electoral coalition that might force its representatives onto a different path.

In the absence of an alternative demographic or ideological base from which to build influence, the ambitious Republican politician has one option if he or she hopes to advance within the party: rigid commitment to ideological purity. The only way to get ahead is to out-conservative — or now, out-MAGA — your rivals.

There is no incentive for anything else. If you want to win a primary, if you want to ascend to leadership, if you want to avoid the ire of conservative media, if you want to be on a national ticket, then you cannot have enemies to your right. There is no room, in the national Republican Party, for the moderate Republican governor of a Democratic state — the Larry Hogans and Charlie Bakers of American politics. There is not even room, it turns out, for the pragmatic conservatives of the party — the Nikki Haleys and Mitt Romneys.

Ostensibly, the pressure to win a general election should work to curb and curtail this dynamic. But the demographic homogeneity of the Republican coalition confers a distinct advantage on the party: It gives it a high floor from which to engage the biennial contest for control of the national government. When enough states in the union are low density and low population, the party that dominates the nation's rural areas already controls nearly half the seats in the Senate and has a significant advantage in the House of Representatives as well.

What's more, the efficient distribution of Republican and Republican-leaning voters — rural and exurban America extends through every state — means that, as we've seen in two of the last six presidential elections, a Republican presidential candidate does not need to win the most votes nationwide to win the Electoral College and therefore the White House.

The ability to win power without winning votes is a powerful disincentive to change. As we see with Trump's struggle to break out of his MAGA echo chamber, it stunts a politician's — and a party's — ability to reach beyond the faithful. It has also stimulated, among the Republican rank-and-file, a real disdain for what the Republican senator Mike Lee called "rank democracy," exemplified in the assertion that the United States is a "republic, not a democracy." It makes sense: If more democracy would make it harder for Republicans to win, then more democracy can't be good.

The United States will always have a conservative party, but American democracy needs that party to be committed to the maintenance of our democratic institutions. The only way to plot a path from here to there is to forcibly change the incentives within the Republican Party, which is to say, the only way to break the fever is to change the rules of the game. A more democratic American democracy — where majorities elect and majorities rule — would force the Republican Party to try, once again, to compete for national majorities.

The reforms are straightforward. End the Electoral College and move to a national popular vote, possibly by embracing the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. End partisan gerrymandering and experiment with forms of voting that might enable more party competition, like fusion, which would let two or more parties nominate the same candidate for office. End the filibuster and pass a new, more robust Voting Rights Act. Grant Washington, D.C., statehood in accordance with the wishes of a majority of its residents. And pursue reform of the entire federal judiciary, so that the Supreme Court, which has been too happy to help Republicans entrench minority rule in the states, cannot take an ax to this agenda.

If the aim of both the Democratic Party and its allies is to protect and defend American democracy, then it cannot avoid a confrontation with those aspects of the American system that enabled the Republican spiral into nihilism. If Democrats win control of Washington in November, they should make reforming our democracy a priority, since even without Trump, the sickness in the Republican Party will remain. It will take strong medicine to save the patient. Democrats must be prepared to administer the cure.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, X and Threads.

Jamelle Bouie became a New York Times Opinion columnist in 2019. Before that he was the chief political correspondent for Slate magazine. He is based in Charlottesville, Va., and Washington. @jbouie

A version of this article appears in print on Aug. 18, 2024, Section SR, Page 2 of the New York edition with the headline: Reform Is Boring. We Still Need It. . Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe



Charlie

Thursday, August 15, 2024

Monday, August 12, 2024

Supreme Court reform widely popular, new poll shows

Georgia invites more partisan election bickering with new rule


A new rule invites local Georgia election boards to conduct studies of election results before certifying the election. The author argues that this invites more partisan bickering rather than adding any integrity to the election process. He says the courts are the proper setting in which to settle disputes about vote counts. The local boards have less than a week to complete their work.



[The Washington Post] Insurance lobbyists block federal crackdown on costly retirement advice

Insurance lobbyists block federal crackdown on costly retirement advice

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/08/11/insurance-lobbyists-block-fiduciary-rule/

Siding the end of Chevron deference, a federal court has overturned a consumer protection role designed to prevent the insurance industry and financial advisors from putting elderly clients into securities that are more lucrative for the financial advisor. The Biden administration tried to create a standard of best interest of the investor, but the Court hasn't overturned that. 



 

Saturday, August 10, 2024

Jamelle Bouie: J.D. Vance associates oppose democracy

The single most troubling thing about Senator JD Vance — his bizarre understanding of the work of J.R.R. Tolkien notwithstanding — is his close relationship with some of the most extreme elements of the American right.

When asked to explain his worldview, Vance has cited his former boss, Peter Thiel, the billionaire venture capitalist who has written passionately against democracy ("I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible"), and Curtis Yarvin, a software developer turned blogger and provocateur who believes the United States should transition to monarchy ("If Americans want to change their government, they're going to have to get over their dictator phobia"). Yarvin has also written favorably of human bondage (slavery, he once wrote, "is a natural human relationship") and wondered aloud if apartheid wasn't better for Black South Africans.

While Vance's admirers see him as a uniquely intellectual presence in American politics — a thinker as much as a politician — his right-wing, authoritarian views are largely derivative of the views and preoccupations of Thiel, Yarvin and their community of "postliberal" ideologues and reactionary venture capitalists. Take Vance's view that the United States is in a period of Romanesque decline. "We are in a late republican period," Vance said on a podcast in 2021. "If we're going to push back against it, we're going to have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with."

Compare this to Thiel's view that "liberalism" and "democracy" are "exhausted," and that to restore the nation "we have to ask some questions very far outside the Overton window." Is this a call for new tax cuts, or does it represent a fundamental hostility toward popular constitutional government in the United States?

In addition to relationships with Thiel and Yarvin, Vance is also in close contact with the bottom feeders on the far right. For nearly two years, according to The Washington Post, Vance was in regular conversation by text message with Chuck Johnson, a notorious Holocaust denier who has spent the better part of a decade promoting right-wing conspiracy theories.

And as my colleague Michelle Goldberg wrote this week, Vance is close enough to Jack Posobiec — an alt-right lunatic who pushed the vile and absurd Pizzagate conspiracy theory and collaborated with online neo-Nazis to spread antisemitic hate — to blurb his latest book, a polemic devoted to the idea that liberals and leftists are Untermenschen who must be stopped lest they destroy civilization. "As they are opposed to humanity itself," Posobiec and his co-author, Joshua Lisec, write, "they place themselves outside of the category completely, in an entirely new misery-driven subdivision, the unhuman."

These are the friends and influences that JD Vance brought with him to the United States Senate, and these will almost certainly be the same friends and influences he'll bring to the White House if he is elected vice president.





Dems ' Attorney: Georgia Election Board Passes Rule That Could Delay Election Certification

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/georgia-elections-board-passes-rule-that-could-delay-election-certification/ 

The new rule requires local boards to conduct inquiries to reasonably determine that the vote is correct. This may conflict with statutory requirement to certify the election by the Monday after the election date.

Thursday, August 8, 2024

Brennan Center says Musk disseminating election falsehoods


AI chatbot Grok and a Musk-funded Super PAC spread false information via Elon Musk's X social media site:
  • Grok: It would be illegal to replace Biden as the Democratic nominee. In reality, he had not yet been nominated.
  • America PAC funded by Musk ran ads that led potential voters to enter information on the premise that it would help them register to vote, but it did not direct voters in swing states to actual registration sites.

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Catalog of crimes a president could commit under Trump v. U.S.A.


Reviews the specific crimes mentioned in opinions by dissenting justices. Chilling reading that clarifies that we are living through the most severe constitutional crisis since the Civil War.

Charlie Cooper

Monday, August 5, 2024

Justice Thomas Failed to Disclose More Private Jet Trips, Senate Democrats Say

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/05/us/politics/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-private-jet.html 

Clarence Thomas and his wife flew from Hawaii to New Zealand and a plane paid for by billionaire Harlan Crow. This is yet another undisclosed gift to Justice. Thomas. It raises the question of tax violations as well as ethical violations.