Sunday, February 26, 2017

REPRESENT US

It has been quite a start to 2017, and I would like to devote this "insider update" to the recent news surrounding our victory in South Dakota, and the resulting repeal.

What happened

Last month, South Dakota legislators did something so brazen it boggles the mind: they repealed the Anti-Corruption Act that voters passed in November -- in the state ranked the 4th most corrupt in the nation. They did this without feedback from communities they represent, and by adding a bogus "emergency clause" which fast-tracked a vote in the House and Senate, and kept the Anti-Corruption Act from being referred back to the ballot. While our members and allies were able to put substantial pressure on lawmakers, the repeal passed anyway. This garnered attention from multiple national and local media outlets, and led to an outpouring of support for South Dakota from across the country.

South Dakota's response

South Dakotans are mad as hell, and they're letting their politicians know. Hundreds of residents from across the state showed up at the capital, Pierre, for multiple actions with chants of "respect our vote" before a climactic final vote. And because of the tremendous support of our donors, you, we were able to provide support transportation, help with communications, and we captured all the action with cameras for use in future inspiration and organizing. South Dakotans are continuing to show up at town hall meetings with elected officials to express their outrage that the will of the people was overturned. In just the past month, Represent South Dakota has formed four energized chapters -- that's a lot for a state with very few people!

What's next

The House and Senate have introduced a series of laws to "replace" the Anti-Corruption Act piecemeal, including a lobbyist gift ban, an increase in the time allowed between serving as an election official and working as a lobbyist, and establishing a "Government Accountability Task Force," which would study government, campaign finance, lobbyist restrictions, and ethics. While these are positive steps, we are watching them get riddled with loopholes, and some are actually making the corruption problem even worse. We are issuing press releases, and dogging legislators, and when the legislature adjourns on March 10, we'll know what the replacement laws actually look like. Rest assured, we have ideas of how we can have the final victory in South Dakota, and I look forward to providing more details to you next month.


The attack on the people of South Dakota is not just South Dakota's problem: it's our problem. We will continue to fight by supporting our volunteers on-the-ground, by spreading the word, and by holding those elected to represent us accountable to do just that.

As always, thank you for your support, 

Halley Gmeiner
Manager of Membership Engagement
Represent.Us 

Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Republican victories in states may pave way for convention

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/republican-success-opens-door-amending-us-constitution

 

A good, neutral assessment of how Republican victories in states relate to convention prospects. Also, this on the history of the drive for a convention on Balanced Budget amendment:

 

The movement peaked at 32 states when Missouri passed a resolution calling for a convention in 1983, then dipped to about half that as numerous states rescinded their resolutions. The tally began growing again after Republicans swept into control of many capitols in 2010.

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.GetMoneyOutMD.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Sunday, February 19, 2017

History of amendment process under U. S. Constitution

https://www.archives.gov/amending-america

 

Of 11,000 amendment proposals, only 27 have been enacted, but expanding democracy is a major theme of the successful ones. GMOM had a tour conducted by co-curator Chrstine Blackerby. On display at the National Archives Museum in Washington, DC from March 11, 2016 – September 4, 2017.

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.GetMoneyOutMD.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Friday, February 17, 2017

The case for limiting donations to political parties

http://www.truth-out.org/speakout/item/39476-on-campaign-finance-party-finance-constitutional-amendments-and-political-party-reform

 

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.GetMoneyOutMD.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

New organization to fight voter suppression

http://www.upworthy.com/voter-fraud-isnt-the-problem-voter-suppression-is-meet-the-man-who-wants-to-solve-it?c=upw1&u=683168d8a7245aa207876152f79bbdf6e3552b97

 

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.GetMoneyOutMD.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Election Assistance Agency in peril

https://www.thenation.com/article/house-republicans-just-voted-to-eliminate-the-only-federal-agency-that-makes-sure-voting-machines-cant-be-hacked/

 

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.getmoneyoutmd.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Saturday, February 4, 2017

Wyoming House considers resolution condemning Citizens United

http://www.wyofile.com/blog/house-panel-passes-resolution-citizens-united/

 

The resolution would be advisory to Congress only, but it contains some excellent language on reserving Constitutional political rights to natural persons. “Corporations have privileges not enjoyed by natural persons, such as limited liability, perpetual life, and favorable treatment . . . which may enable corporations to financially overwhelm individual natural persons in the political process. . . .”

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.getmoneyoutmd.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Maryland legislature set to repeal prior convention calls

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-democrats-trump-20170131-story.html

 

Majority Leader Frick uses this occasion to raise general fears of the convention process.

 

Charlie Cooper

H: 410-578-8291

C: 410-624-6095

www.getmoneyoutmd.org 

 

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.” – Louis Brandeis

 

Frequently Asked Questions - Convention of States

Fwd: [New post] 2018 Maryland House of Delegates Ratings, Part I

New post on Seventh State

2018 Maryland House of Delegates Ratings, Part I

by David Lublin

While we await the Governor's State of the State Address, 7S announces its first ratings for the 2018 elections to the Maryland House of Delegates. The House has 141 members--three times as many as the Senate. (See Senate Ratings Part I and Part II for ratings for the other body.)

Due to the much greater number of delegates, I focus only on safe Democratic seats today. Turns out that's a majority of them.

Districts and Method of Election

All legislative districts elect three delegates and one senator. In most, the three delegates run at-large but others are divided into two (A and B) or three (A, B and C) subdistricts for delegate elections. Some are split, such as D37 on the Eastern Shore, are split in two to comply with protections for minority representation under the Voting Rights.

In other cases, districts are also split to provide small counties the chance to elect one delegate. The division of D1 into three parts, for example, enables Garrett to elect a delegate and for Allegany to have one subdistrict entirely within its borders.

Political Geography

Each of the two major parties dominates large swaths of the State, resulting in a large number of safe districts. Let's start with the Democrats, who by my estimation start of with 74 safe seats--three more than required for a majority.

All of these districts were won by Anthony Brown in 2014 and Hillary Clinton in 2016. Democrats have no worries about any seats in Baltimore City (Districts 40-41, 43, 44A, 45-6), Charles (28), Montgomery (14-20, 39), and Prince George's (21-6, 27A, 47). These four jurisdictions alone get the Democrats to 65 seats.

Democrats are also sure to carry D37A, the sole African-American majority district on the Eastern Shore. For similar reasons, Democrats are a lock in D10 and D44B in Baltimore County. That gives the them another six seats to get them up to 74.

Note that many of the current occupants of these may run for other offices or retire. In Montgomery, Dels. Luedtke, Platt, Carr, Waldstreicher, Kramer and Barkley may run for county office. Dels. Frick and Kelly have also expressed interest in running for other offices should the opportunity arise. There is also speculation that Dels. Gutierrez and Hixson may retire.

As in the Senate, the question is not whether Democrats will win a majority but if they can retain their ability to override vetoes should Governor Hogan win reelection.

Part II will look at safe Republican seats..

 

David Lublin | February 1, 2017 at 7:00 am | URL: http://wp.me/p4mKJE-1Yy

Unsubscribe to no longer receive posts from Seventh State.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://www.theseventhstate.com/?p=7598